Book Review: Guilty, by Ann Coulter

34370891Ann Coulter is a guilty pleasure (no pun intended!).  I always enjoy reading her since she’s unmatched in her flair for marshaling anecdotes and statistics to defend her conservative take on the world.  Reading her, I invariably wish more liberals would take her seriously and accept the challenges to their assumptions implied in her bold assertions.

But it’s not to be, because Coulter is also our nation’s most blistering satirist, loading each page of her books with punishing sarcasm so intense that anyone on the business side of it is likely to get hurt.  (With this book, the third of hers that I’ve read, I finally noticed just how often she’ll develop a paragraph with unflinching facts to make a case, cite a source, and then throw away the last line of the paragraph on a snarky taunt.  As humor, it works and she’s good at it.) 

So Coulter’s not looking to make any converts here, which is good if our priority is to be entertained while having our understanding of the world reinforced, but not so much if we want to win over the hearts of those who might be contributing to the problems she laments so that we might actually improve things. 

Coulter’s thesis in Guilty is substantially similar to that of her second book, Slander: the media is heavily biased against Republicans and in favor of Democrats.  However, Guilty updates the examples and focuses on more specific areas of the double standard, such as the fixation with claiming victimhood and decrying the “Republican attack machine.”

As in Coulter’s other work, she is at her weakest as she composes with a frenetic, rambling energy.  When I read John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty, my most consistent thought was how impressed I was by his rigorous organization: each thought clearly connected to all others in a series, each flowing together and supporting his points in balanced, logical order.  I wanted to outline it, which would be a natural application of Mill’s text. 

Outlining Coulter would be much harder.  She often jumps trains of thought sans transitions, obsesses over relatively minor episodes that clearly fascinate her even if the reader would probably prefer to see more discussion of the major events that she sometimes gives short shrift, and even ends her book with a peremptory conclusion compacted into a single paragraph, as if she ran out of time and needed to wrap things up with only a rough recapitulation. 

The best thing about the book is what makes those idiosyncratic flaws tolerable.  The second chapter, the already famous one about single mothers, is jaw dropping.  Coulter lays out the facts: children raised by single mothers account for the vast majority of all social dysfunction in our country, and we encourage it in the name of self-fulfillment for adults. 

I saw Coulter on a segment of Dr. Phil recently, and he laid into her about it.  She defended the facts, but he came back with the excuses that one would expect: not all women choose to be in that position, and not all children from that environment turn out bad. 

Well, duh.

Actually, Coulter’s chapter mentioned multiple times that, while divorced women do tend to have problem children, the worst demographic, and the target of her criticism, are the increasing numbers of women who choose to have children without having ever been married at all.  No matter how many “heroic” women Dr. Phil trots out to dish about their abusive ex husbands and their struggle to make ends meet for their honors student, it won’t cancel out the fact that most of America’s ills have their roots in such homes, and that they’re a substandard substitute for a loving, two parent nuclear family.

Finally, one more thought.  In a later chapter, Coulter contrasts the many hypocritical “victims” lionized by the liberal media establishment with those conservatives who have actually been harassed and even attacked.  I was surprised that, despite several public incidents of violence against her, Coulter left herself out of the list.  I credit this to her dignity and desire to not indulge in the kind of self promotion she scorns throughout her book.

Good for her.

3 comments on “Book Review: Guilty, by Ann Coulter

  1. Well, you turned me on to Coulter, and while I’m not the leftie I was back in High School (I categorize myself as a centrist) I have to say that reading Coulter is about as close to a conversion as you can log. I found her to be funny and intelligent and thoroughly enjoyed How To Talk To A Liberal (If you must). As people get on her for her sarcasm and satire, I’m always flabbergasted how Al Franken gets a pass. Oh, that’s right, the media, I forgot.

    Full disclosure: I still do like Franken.

  2. Although Conservatives play the victims just as much as Liberals, hence Ann Coulter IS playing the victim while writing the book, but I still rather enjoyed “Guilty”, much better than the previous, “Goddless” book she did years ago which was just ridiculous theories about religion. I couldn’t finish it I was bored by that one. This one however, is better. I thought it was fun, political and enjoyable to read. You don’t have to take it as Gospel, it’s more meant to entertain, just another point of view. She writes it with a twinge of humor so it doesn’t sound completely bitter over liberals. I don’t consider myself conservative or liberal so it didn’t offend or confirm anything for me, but rather read it because it was pulling me in…especially that “single mother” chapter. Interesting stuff.

  3. Tyler, I’ll agree with you up to a point: conservatives are certainly getting some serious mileage out of being the perceived underdog these days (Hannity is starting off his show with words like “underground” and “resistance”), but playing the underdog isn’t the same as playing the victim, especially when that victim mentality is as endemic and fatuous as it is with many liberals.

    The “single mother” chapter is definitely a shocker, and I wish it would be discussed even more. It drives me up the wall when people like our new attorney general say that we’re cowards and need to have a real conversation about things like race–which we’ve been doing for decades, openly, constantly, and very productively–but the far more pressing issues–like unwed mothers–go ignored because they might be difficult. Ironic. And sad.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s